| Seminars | Newspaper Next | Discussion Leaders | Targeted Solutions | About API | Home |
Have You Moved?
Join our mailing list!
Coming to API
Discussion Leaders
Susan Goldberg
Editor, The Plain Dealer Appearing at: Beyond the Newsroom 03/22/2010 - 03/24/2010 Seminar Schedule
Find Seminars
Early-bird Deadlines Register soon for early-bird savings: |
First Amendment / Free Speech![]()
Next 11 >> of 36 Articles. No place to hide: Privacy invasion and censorshipBy Paul K. McMasters | Tuesday, January 31, 2006 Most Americans are always ready to tick off any number of reasons they value their privacy. One of the most important reasons does not come quickly to mind, however, and that is how important personal privacy is to freedom of expression.
Blowing the whistle can also blow a career By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, January 12, 2006 When it comes to free-speech protections for federal employees, the Constitution sometimes isn’t quite enough.
Prying by the press more difficult, and more important, than ever By Paul K. McMasters | Monday, January 02, 2006 An increasingly formidable barrier of official secrecy has made it very difficult for the press to report on covert government activities against its citizens. But such reporting has never been more important.
Too much secrecy is a challenge to justice By Paul K. McMasters | Friday, December 16, 2005 Because nearly every matter of consequence and controversy in our society eventually winds up in court, Americans have a vital interest in staying informed about how well justice is delivered.
Racy downloads become more daring -- and portable By Paul K. McMasters | Monday, December 05, 2005 Handheld devices such as cell phones and digital music players offer much in the way of features and convenience. Most also are capable of providing adult content: pornography to go.
Leaks keep the ship of state afloat By Paul K. McMasters | Friday, November 18, 2005 Without an elaborate system for circumventing secrecy and information management and manipulation, there would be no way or no one to hold accountable those entrusted with our government.
The crime of speaking ill of your betters By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, November 03, 2005 Defenders of criminal-libel laws insist that they are needed to ensure public order and government stability. If those rationales ever had any validity, they no longer do. Instead, such laws are a pernicious assault on our First Amendment principles.
Fear of dissent is a fear of freedom By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, October 20, 2005 One does not have to endorse or defend anti-war or anti-military sentiments raised in peaceful protests to recognize the risk that suppressing dissenting voices poses for a vital democracy. Whether stifling such voices is done in the name of good order or disagreement with the message, such actions reflect a fear of dissent.
New Supreme Court needs new First Amendment direction By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, October 06, 2005 Sooner or later, the nation's most vexing disagreements over our most vital issues wind up before the Supreme Court. None quite penetrates to the core of our democratic being more than those involving First Amendment rights and values.
Journalists in jail: bad news for a democracy By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, September 22, 2005 We are much more circumspect when we threaten journalists who irritate government officials or confound government procedures. We try to follow the law and we respect the Constitution. But we still find ways to send journalists to jail.
Constructing a red light district on the Internet By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, September 01, 2005 Pornography fighters and some pornography producers have joined forces to oppose a seemingly uncontroversial proposal to create a special .xxx domain on the Internet to help protect children (and others) from adult content
Censorship by any other name is so much easier By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, August 18, 2005 Given the strong views Penny Nance has expressed as an activist and lobbyist and in congressional testimony, her arrival at the FCC may signal an invigorated FCC campaign against allegedly indecent programming.
Video-game ratings: a tool or a weapon? By Paul K. McMasters | Tuesday, August 02, 2005 A steamy snippet of a new video game leaves lawmakers hot under the collar, and could lead to the turning of a voluntary ratings system into a political tool to limit free speech.
Patriot Act is Exhibit A on the risks of secrecy By Paul K. McMasters | Friday, July 15, 2005 The Patriot Act is only a fraction of the secrecy problem. Door after door in our open society is closing, generally without notice, let alone protest, as we try to secure our nation from attack.
Journalists need lessons in freedom of the press By Steve Buttry | Friday, July 08, 2005 In training and education programs for budding journalists and veterans alike, we need to explain what the First Amendment means and how important the free press is to our democracy and our society. We need to teach journalists their responsibility to understand and defend that freedom.
Giving up a source or giving up freedom By Paul K. McMasters | Tuesday, July 05, 2005 Last week, the courts delivered a one-two punch to journalists’ ability to protect their sources – and to the public’s right to know about federal officials abusing a public trust in one instance and the disappearance of nuclear secrets in another.
Balancing our free speech rights away By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, June 16, 2005 There is more than a trace of irony in the fact that the most freedom-loving people on the planet have decided collectively that some words, in some situations, are just too threatening to good order and comfort to allow.
When school grounds become free-speech battlegrounds By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, June 02, 2005 Most of us believe that schools should serve as something of a sanctuary from the coarseness that permeates our culture. The trick is to find a way to teach the principles of freedom while limiting the practice of those principles.
Press pays a price for anonymous sources By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, May 19, 2005 There are some hopeful signs that both sides can find a way around this seeming impasse over when and how to use anonymous sources.
A question of priorities: bin Laden’s privacy or your right to know? By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, May 05, 2005 Proposals for restrictions on access to information continue to muddle and muzzle public discourse, whether invoked for privacy, security or, ironically, for "freedom."
Movie-sanitizing technology: clean flicks or dirty tricks? By Paul K. McMasters | Friday, April 22, 2005 As the tools for tailoring all communication to our individual comfort zones become more sophisticated and available, we will have the power to convert everything that comes our way to just another version of what we already know and believe. That would be most unwise.
Censors say the darnedest things By Paul K. McMasters | Thursday, March 31, 2005 While censors twist themselves into logic pretzels by saying the darnedest things, the self-censors limit their creative rights by obsessing about offense.
Government secrecy: dark cloud over an open society By Paul K. McMasters | Tuesday, March 22, 2005 How does a nation that celebrates the idea of openness find itself shackled to a government information system that has a default setting of secrecy?
A more mature approach to video-game violence By Paul K. McMasters | Sunday, February 20, 2005 Those who push for laws based on exaggerated science and a low opinion of the moral and emotional fiber of young people and their parents’ judgment should think through the logic of their efforts.
What we can’t know hurts us By Paul K. McMasters | Monday, February 07, 2005 Americans must insist that government leaders manage sensitive information without trying to control public opinion or participation.
Next 11 >> of 36 Articles.
![]()
|